- An entrepreneur failed to file a VAT return for the last quarter of 2018 and later submitted a late return with high VAT due and even higher input tax.
- The tax inspector denied the input tax deduction, finding the invoices insufficiently specific and the entrepreneur’s explanation incoherent.
- The inspector imposed a higher burden of proof on the entrepreneur due to the missing VAT return.
- The Supreme Court ruled that this increased burden of proof is mandatory under national law and compatible with EU law.
- The case was referred to the Amsterdam Court to determine if the entrepreneur convincingly proved the tax assessment was incorrect.
Source: fiscount.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Supreme Court Ruling: Customs Duties and VAT on Flea Treatment Products for Cats and Dogs
- Artistic Murals Do Not Qualify as House Painting for Reduced VAT Rate Under Dutch Law
- Key Changes to Zero VAT Rate Decree Table II Effective February 28, 2026
- Reduced VAT Rate Not Applicable to Artistic Murals, Only to Residential Painting and Plastering
- VAT Exemption Not Applicable to Credit Management After Sale of Credits, Says Advocate General













