- The CJEU ruled that tax courts can independently assess the right to deduct VAT, using evidence from dismissed criminal cases against third parties, as long as the rights of the defense are maintained.
- In the case of Fashion TV RO SRL, the Romanian tax authorities denied VAT deduction based on claims of fictitious transactions linked to inactive suppliers, despite the dismissal of criminal charges against the company’s director and accountant due to insufficient evidence.
- The court clarified that the ne bis in idem principle does not apply here, as it involves different legal entities, and reaffirmed that national courts must verify VAT deduction criteria, allowing for the consideration of evidence from criminal proceedings to establish potential fraud or misuse.
Source BTW Jurisprudentie
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
- Podcasts & briefing documents: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ Case C-639/24: Limits on Denying VAT Exemption for Intra-Community Supplies
- European Parliament Analysis: The Role of the Reverse Charge Mechanism in Tackling VAT Fraud
- Mathez Formation: VAT news: the CJEU puts economic reality back at the centre of the game (Feb 6)
- Blog: Navigating Indirect Rebates: A Call for Clarity in VAT Regulations Under ViDA
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-462/16 – Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG – Discounts reduce the VAT value of pharmaceutical supplies













