- The Court of ’s-Hertogenbosch ruled that X BV and C BV form a VAT fiscal unity due to close financial, organizational, and significant economic interdependence.
- X BV is a holding company; C BV operates a cafeteria and ice cream parlor, renting property and inventory from X BV.
- Both companies are ultimately owned and managed by the same individual.
- The court found that one person leads both entities and that the rental relationship constitutes a substantial economic connection.
- X BV’s appeal was dismissed; the fiscal unity designation remains in effect.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Pension Fund’s Insurance Service Exempt from VAT; No Right to Input Tax Deduction
- VAT Assessment Upheld Due to Missing Invoices and Insufficient Proof for Deductions and Loans
- EU Court: Spain Must Grant VAT Exemption for Group-Provided Cleaning Services to Members
- Enterprise Pension Fund’s Services Qualify as VAT-Exempt Insurance, Court Rules
- Dutch Court Upholds Higher Duties on Knee Protectors, Rejects Refund Due to Misclassification
