- A Dutch holding company sold a luxury car to its director for far below market value, reporting the difference as a disguised dividend.
- The tax inspector issued an additional VAT assessment, claiming the low sale price was an abuse of law to avoid proper VAT.
- The Amsterdam Court of Appeal agreed, increasing the tax base to reflect the car’s true value despite the Netherlands not implementing the relevant EU VAT provision.
- The Supreme Court appeal argued abuse of law shouldn’t apply without national implementation, but the Advocate General recommended rejecting this, citing EU law’s anti-abuse requirements.
- The recommendation is to dismiss the appeal and uphold the lower court’s decision.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Despite the absence of a tax representative, the application of the zero rate
- Comments on T-184/25: Transfers of credit portfolios and VAT: AG puts credit management exemption under pressure
- New Four-Year VAT Adjustment for Investment Services on Real Estate Starting 2026
- VAT refund rightly refused due to unproven previous payment
- VAT Rules for Unpaid Invoices: When Can Entrepreneurs Reclaim or Repay VAT?
