- Littlewoods sought to recover input VAT on photography costs used for catalogues and its online store.
- HMRC denied full recovery, arguing the costs also supported exempt finance and insurance supplies, requiring apportionment.
- The Tribunal ruled in favor of Littlewoods, finding the photography costs were exclusively for taxable retail sales, not for exempt supplies.
- No restriction on input tax recovery was required as the link to exempt supplies was indirect or non-existent.
- The judge distinguished this case from previous cases, noting different circumstances and legal tests.
Source: marcusward.co
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Athena Luxe Ltd FTT Ruling: Validity of Invoices and HMRC Discretion on Input Tax Recovery
- VAT Zero Rating Allowed for Disability Access Card Hired to Users: Nimbus v HMRC
- HMRC Issues New Guidance on VAT Treatment of Overage Payments in Property Sales
- VAT Zero Rating for Access Card: Nimbus v HMRC – Equipment for Disabled Persons Appeal Allowed
- HMRC Launches Initiate Payment API to Streamline Digital Payments and Reduce Compliance Burdens













