- The FTT refused HMRC’s application to strike out PRB Trading Ltd’s appeal against input VAT denial and penalties.
- HMRC argued the appeal had no reasonable prospect of success, but the FTT found a full hearing was necessary to consider all evidence.
- The tribunal noted that even if the appellant’s case appears weak, it cannot be dismissed without examining all documents and cross-examining witnesses.
- The FTT emphasized the appellant’s right to challenge evidence and to be presumed innocent regarding penalties, citing Article 6 rights.
- The application to strike out was deemed premature and misconceived, as it failed to apply the correct legal test.
Source: claritaxnews.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK VAT Rules on Online Prize Draws Face Scrutiny Amid New Voluntary Code and Industry Growth
- How UK Businesses Accidentally Trigger US State Sales Tax Through Ecommerce and Economic Nexus
- Director Liable for VAT Fraud and PAYE/NIC on Withdrawals: Ellis & Anor v HMRC (2026)
- UK VAT Gap Rises to £11.9bn in 2024–25, HMRC Reports 6.5% Shortfall
- Luzha v HMRC: VAT Late Submission Penalties Upheld, No Reasonable Excuse Found, Appeal Dismissed














