- The CJ ruled that customs value should generally be determined using the transaction value method, even if the price is provisional and subject to later adjustment based on objective, uncontrollable factors.
- Tauritus imported fuel into Lithuania using provisional prices, later adjusted according to market rates, but failed to amend customs values when final prices were higher, resulting in unpaid import VAT.
- The Lithuanian Supreme Administrative Court questioned whether the transaction value method was appropriate for provisional prices and whether declarants must amend customs declarations when using alternative valuation methods.
- The CJ clarified that the use of provisional prices does not preclude the transaction value method if final adjustments are based on objective factors beyond the parties’ control.
Source: loyensloeff.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EDPS Opinion on EPPO and OLAF Access to VAT Data for Combating EU Fraud
- EU Agrees on Temporary €3 Customs Duty for Low-Value E-Commerce Parcels from July 2026
- New InfoCuria case-law database and search tool
- New General Court VAT case – C-903/25 (Grotta Nuova) – No details known yet
- New General Court VAT case – C-914/25 (Modelo Continente Hipermercados) – No details known yet













