- The ECJ is considering whether businesses can be denied VAT recovery solely because their supplier’s VAT number was revoked or inactive at the time of supply.
- This issue creates uncertainty and financial risk for businesses, especially those seeking cross-border VAT refunds.
- The case (C-465/25, Matin Maier v Romania) could clarify if administrative issues on the supplier’s side should affect the buyer’s right to recover VAT.
- The ECJ has previously ruled that VAT recovery should not be denied for purely formal reasons if the supply is genuine and properly documented.
- The outcome will have significant implications for VAT refund practices across the EU.
Source: vatit.com
Click on the logo to visit the website
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
- Podcasts & briefing documents: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ VAT C-409/24 to C-411/24 – Judgment – Reduced VAT Rate Excludes Non-Accommodation Ancillary Services
- ECJ C-436/24 (Lyko Operations) – Judgment – Loyalty Points in Customer Reward Schemes Are Not VAT Vouchers
- ECJ C-472/24 (Žaidimų valiuta) – Judgment – VAT Exemption Denied for Virtual Money Transactions
- ECG T-96/26 (TellusTax Advisory) – Questions – VAT deductions in the event of different VAT treatment between Member States
- VIDA Measures applicable from 1 January 2027
