- The case concerns whether a majority interest for financial interdependence under Article 7(4) Wet OB 1968 can be established at the level of a cooperating group of shareholders.
- X and two other companies want to be considered a fiscal unity for VAT purposes; their shares are held 50/50 by two individuals.
- X argues that the two shareholders form a cooperating group, thus meeting the financial interdependence requirement, referencing a 1979 Supreme Court ruling.
- The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court rejected this, stating the majority of shares was not in the same hands and voting agreements do not create a fiscal unity.
- Advocate General Ettema advises the Supreme Court to dismiss the appeal.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No VAT group according to AG due to lack of financial interconnectedness
- VAT in 2026: mark these deadlines in your calendar
- Supreme Court Upholds Additional VAT Assessment Due to Insufficient Proof Against Revenue Reconstruction
- Tourist Tax Included in VAT Base for Campsite Services, Supreme Court Rules
- Post-Master EU VAT Programme: In-Depth, International, Hybrid Learning at Erasmus University Rotterdam














