- The ECJ ruled that VAT liability must follow the actual supplier of services, not a “designated partner” under national partnership rules if that partner did not supply the services.
- Member States cannot reallocate VAT debts through administrative mechanisms that do not reflect economic reality.
- The VAT Directive requires that VAT is owed by the entity that independently supplies the service in its own name and bears the economic risk.
- In the case, the branches that contracted with customers and supplied services were the taxable persons, not Česká síť, despite national rules suggesting otherwise.
- Internal or contractual arrangements do not override the factual VAT analysis; only the actual supplier is liable for VAT.
Source: globalvatcompliance.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Business Leaders Call on EU to Modernize Customs Union and Revive Türkiye Membership Talks
- EU VAT Compliance Gap Hits €128 Billion in 2023, Driven by Six Major Economies
- EU Triangular Transactions: More Than Three Parties Allowed, Rules European Court in 2025 Decision
- INTA Reviews EU Proposal to Extend CBAM to Downstream Goods and Strengthen Anti-Circumvention Measures
- European Commission Evaluates Fiscalis Programme’s Impact on EU Tax Fraud Prevention and Cooperation













