Recent ECJ/General Court VAT Jurisprudence and Implications for EU Compliance (December 2025)

Podcast

Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Podcasts & briefing documents: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify

I. Overview

This briefing summarizes key themes, recent European Court of Justice (ECJ) and General Court cases, and Advocate General (AG) opinions concerning Value Added Tax (VAT) within the European Union, predominantly focusing on developments through December 2025. The analysis covers a variety of topics including VAT exemptions, intra-Community supplies, transfer pricing, taxable amount adjustments, invoicing requirements, and the application of VAT in complex supply chains. A recurring theme is the tension between strict application of formal rules and the overarching principle of fiscal neutrality.

II. Key Themes & Concepts

Fiscal Neutrality: A guiding principle that requires VAT to be applied broadly and consistently to avoid distorting competition, ensuring that businesses are not unfairly burdened or advantaged. Key case: C-227/21 (HA.EN.). Quote: “…the right of taxable persons to deduct from the VAT which they are liable to pay the VAT due or paid on goods purchased and services received by them as inputs is a fundamental principle of the common system of VAT established by EU legislation.”
Substance Over Form: A trend in ECJ rulings that prioritizes the underlying economic reality of a transaction over strict adherence to formal requirements, especially regarding documentation. Key case: C-639/24 (FLO VENEER). Quote: “VAT exemption cannot be denied due to missing specific evidence defined by Quick Fixes.”
The Significance of Invoices: Accurate and complete invoices are crucial for VAT deductibility. Requirements include details like VAT ID, description of services and, importantly, if a reverse charge applies. Quote: “The case confirmed that strict compliance with invoicing requirements is essential—missing the “reverse charge” phrase invalidates the simplification.” – from comments on Luxury Trust (C‑247/21).
Joint and Several Liability: Allows Member States to hold a person other than the supplier (e.g., the customer) liable for VAT payments under certain conditions. Key Case: C-121/24 (Vaniz). Quote: “Article 205 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC… must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation under which the person held jointly and severally liable for payment of value added tax… may incur liability after the person liable for payment of that tax has ceased to exist as a legal person…”
Triangulation and Chain Transactions: Complex scenarios involving multiple parties in different member states, with specific rules for simplifying VAT obligations and preventing double taxation. Key case: T-646/24 (MS KLJUCAROVCI).

III. Key ECJ/General Court Cases Decided in 2025

This section summarizes key cases decided in 2025, emphasizing their implications for businesses.

C-121/24 (Vaniz): Joint VAT liability valid post-debtor dissolution if third-party knowledge exists. This case clarifies that authorities can pursue joint liability even after the main debtor is dissolved, if the third party knew or should have known the VAT wouldn’t be paid.
C-796/23 (Česká síť): Managing partner not liable for other partners’ independently provided service VAT. The ECJ ruled against holding a managing partner liable for VAT on services independently provided by other partners within a “society.” This emphasizes that VAT liability rests with the entity carrying out the economic activity, not necessarily the management structure.
T-646/24 (MS KLJUCAROVCI): Triangular transactions can qualify for VAT simplifications despite delivery variations. The Court confirmed that triangulation can apply even if goods are delivered to a fourth party (the customer of the customer) and stressed fraud prevention – authorities can deny the simplification if the intermediary knew of VAT fraud.
T-657/24 (Versãofast): VAT exemptions apply uniformly; intermediaries effectively support credit negotiations. VAT exemptions for financial services apply consistently, even for intermediaries who don’t directly influence credit terms but contribute to the negotiation.
C-570/24 (Ecoserv): EU Excise Duty Liability and the Impact of National Criminal Judgments. Addresses the interplay between excise duty liability and national criminal proceedings, regarding missing excise goods.
C-639/24 (FLO VENEER): VAT exemption cannot be denied due to missing specific evidence defined by Quick Fixes. Highlights the importance of assessing all available evidence for VAT exemption in intra-Community supplies rather than relying solely on formal documentation.
C-234/24 (Brose Prievidza): VAT Refund Not Barred by Lack of Export. VAT refund can not be barred by lack of export in case of intra-community supply of tooling.
C-232/24 (Kosmiro): Factoring Fees Are Taxable Services Under EU VAT Law. This case determined that factoring fees are taxable services, rather than exempt financial transactions.
C-744/23 (Zlakov): Pro Bono Legal Services are subject to VAT. Clarifies that pro bono legal services, even without monetary compensation, may be subject to VAT.
C-101/24 (XYRALITY): German developer is not liable for VAT on services via an app store. This case assigned VAT liability to the online platform rather than the developer for app sales before Jan 1, 2015.
C-535/24 (Svilosa): Acts by a creditor to recover debt without debtor’s mandate aren’t classified as ‘supply of services’. Self-help actions that a creditor takes to recover debt on its own behalf do not constitute a supply of services under VAT law.
C-726/23 (Arcomet Towercranes): Transfer Pricing Adjustment for intra-group services subject to VAT; documentation required. Transfer pricing adjustments for intra-group services may trigger VAT if they compensate a service and documentation is present.
C-427/23 (Határ Diszkont): Managing VAT refund files is an independent supply subject to VAT, not exempted from VAT. An administrative service such as managing VAT refund files for customers can be subject to VAT.
C-794/23 (Finanzamt Österreich): Taxpayer not liable for incorrectly charged VAT to non-taxables. Traders are not liable for overcharged VAT on invoices to non-taxable persons, if there is no wrongful VAT deduction.
C-433/24 (Galerie Karsten Greve): Article 316(1)(b) allows art supply by dealers via legal entities if properly attributed. The ECJ determined that the VAT margin scheme can apply to sales made by an art dealer, regardless of whether they act through a legal entity.

IV. Key Implications & Compliance Recommendations

Based on the summarized sources, businesses operating within the EU VAT system should consider the following:

Documentation & Evidence: Maintain thorough documentation to support VAT positions, especially for intra-Community supplies. Be prepared to provide a variety of evidence beyond the “Quick Fixes” requirements.
Invoice Accuracy: Ensure invoices meet all required criteria (Art. 226), including “Reverse charge” when applicable, as mistakes can have significant VAT consequences.
Due Diligence: Conduct thorough due diligence on business partners to mitigate the risk of being implicated in VAT fraud schemes. Implement “Know Your Customer” procedures.
Transfer Pricing & VAT Alignment: Review transfer pricing policies and ensure that adjustments related to services are appropriately reflected in VAT reporting.
Monitor National Interpretations: Be aware of variations in how Member States interpret and enforce VAT rules, particularly strict approaches like Germany’s.
Stay Informed on ViDA Reforms: Prepare for the upcoming “VAT in the Digital Age” reforms, which are expected to simplify cross-border transactions through single VAT registrations and mandatory e-invoicing.
Seek Expert Advice: Consult with tax professionals for guidance on navigating complex VAT rules and ensuring compliance in specific business contexts.

V. Open Questions & Pending Cases

Several cases are pending before the ECJ/General Court, which may further clarify existing rules. Some noteworthy cases include:

T-773/25 (Finanzamt für Großbetriebe): Concerns the retroactive correction of invoices in intra-Community triangular transactions, particularly whether missing “reverse charge” references can be corrected retroactively.
C-603/24 (Stellantis Portugal): Asks whether “supply of services” includes contractual vehicle sale price adjustments.
T-614/25 (Trading 4): Addresses when ownership transfer triggers tax liability in EU chain transactions.

VI. Future Outlook

The EU VAT landscape is constantly evolving, with a clear trend toward greater harmonization, stricter enforcement, and increased digitalization. Businesses need to proactively adapt to these changes by investing in robust compliance processes, staying informed about the latest case law, and seeking expert advice when needed. The upcoming VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) reforms are set to introduce significant changes, which will require careful planning and implementation to ensure a smooth transition.

This briefing document is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.

Overviews

Judgments (Order)

AG Opinion

Questions