- Court Ruling on Renovation Definition: The Amsterdam Court of Appeal upheld the District Court’s decision, determining that the structural changes made to a hotel property were not significant enough to classify the renovation as ‘essentially new construction,’ despite the substantial renovation costs.
- Condition of Original Structure Considered: The Court emphasized the good condition of the property’s structural components and foundation prior to renovation as a key factor in its decision, indicating that the extent of renovation alone does not warrant a classification as new construction.
- Transfer Tax Implications: X BV’s claim for a refund of €1.2 million in transfer tax was rejected, as the Court found that the acquisition of the assistant engineer’s residence did not qualify for the 2% rate due to its transformation into a commercial space with hotel facilities, rather than being used as a residential property.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Partial VAT Deduction for Home Construction with Integrated Solar Panels Based on Actual Use
- Supreme Court Overturns VAT Penalty Ruling: Key Inspector’s Argument Ignored, Case Referred Back
- New General Court VAT case T-851/25 (Roenes) – No details known yet
- Dutch Tax Authority Loses €1.5 Billion to Vanishing Entrepreneurs via Turbo Liquidations
- Supreme Court: VAT Penalty for Non-Payment, Intent, and Cooperation with Tax Advisor Examined
