- The Supreme Court overturned a lower court’s decision because it failed to address a key argument from the tax inspector regarding late submission of invoices.
- The case involves a VAT group of three companies whose director did not provide sales invoices to their intermediary in time, resulting in incorrect VAT filings.
- The court clarified that a taxpayer cannot rely on an intermediary’s filings if they do not provide necessary information on time.
- The case is sent back to a different court to determine if the invoices were submitted on time and to reassess whether intent or gross negligence justifies the penalty.
- If a penalty remains after reassessment, the new court must consider a one-month delay in the legal process when determining the penalty amount.
Source: taxence.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Partial VAT Deduction for Home Construction with Integrated Solar Panels Based on Actual Use
- New General Court VAT case T-851/25 (Roenes) – No details known yet
- Dutch Tax Authority Loses €1.5 Billion to Vanishing Entrepreneurs via Turbo Liquidations
- Supreme Court: VAT Penalty for Non-Payment, Intent, and Cooperation with Tax Advisor Examined
- Right to VAT Deduction: Burden of Proof and Compatibility with EU Law in Dutch Tax Cases














