- The case concerns VAT law and the right to deduct input tax when no tax return has been filed.
- The main issue is whether the increased burden of proof for taxpayers who fail to file required returns is compatible with EU law.
- The Supreme Court confirms that Dutch procedural tax law allows for a reversal and increase of the burden of proof in such cases, provided it does not conflict with EU principles of effectiveness and equivalence.
- The taxpayer must convincingly prove that all conditions for the right to deduct VAT are met if they have not filed the required tax return.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Partial VAT Deduction for Home Construction with Integrated Solar Panels Based on Actual Use
- Supreme Court Overturns VAT Penalty Ruling: Key Inspector’s Argument Ignored, Case Referred Back
- New General Court VAT case T-851/25 (Roenes) – No details known yet
- Dutch Tax Authority Loses €1.5 Billion to Vanishing Entrepreneurs via Turbo Liquidations
- Supreme Court: VAT Penalty for Non-Payment, Intent, and Cooperation with Tax Advisor Examined













