VATupdate

Share this post on

Comments on ECJ C-121/24: Liability for VAT debt under conditions in the event of bankruptcy of the debtor

  • Background: Vaniz EOOD, a supplier of road freight transport, faced joint and several liability for VAT due to the supplier, Stars International EOOD, failing to pay VAT before insolvency.
  • Court’s Ruling: The Court upheld that national legislation allowing for joint and several liability is compatible with the VAT Directive, particularly Article 205. This provision allows Member States to hold third parties liable for VAT if they knew or should have known that the original supplier would not pay the tax.
  • Conclusion: The Court concluded that the cessation of the original supplier’s legal existence does not exempt the recipient from liability if they were aware of the tax non-payment, affirming the tax authority’s right to recover due VAT efficiently.

Source KPMG


  • The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that Bulgaria did not violate EU law by holding Vaniz EOOD liable for the unpaid VAT of Stars International EOOD, despite Stars no longer existing.
  • The ruling confirmed that Vaniz’s awareness or reasonable suspicion that Stars would not pay the declared VAT was sufficient grounds for liability, as this knowledge impacted Vaniz’s right to deduct VAT.
  • The court emphasized that the dissolution of Stars does not alter Vaniz’s responsibility for the VAT, reinforcing the principle that taxpayers must ensure compliance when exercising their VAT deduction rights.

Source Taxlive


See also

ECJ C-121/24 (Vaniz) – Judgment – Joint VAT liability valid post-debtor dissolution if third-party knowledge exists – VATupdate

VAT Liability and Deduction in the ECJ: Contrasting C-227/21 (HA.EN.) and Vaniz (C-121/24) on Buyer Responsibility and Supplier Insolvency – VATupdate

ECJ C-227/21 (HA.EN.) – Judgment – No Denial of input VAT if the seller would not pay output VAT – VATupdate



 



Sponsors:

Pincvision

Advertisements:

  • vatcomsult