- The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal concluded that the remuneration agreed in the settlement agreement (VSO) was not for parts of the company that had already been transferred to Stichting Y in 2014, as the parties had explicitly excluded the name B and software from the transfer.
- In 2014, X VOF and Stichting Y established clear agreements regarding the transfer of company Z, which included specific exclusions, indicating that both parties were aware of what was being transferred.
- The court ruled that the appeal by X VOF was unfounded, reaffirming that the inclusion of the agreements in the VSO in 2019 did not change the original intentions regarding the transferred assets.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Payment Not Considered Compensation for Transfer of Generality of Goods, Article 37d Not Applicable
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
- Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over VAT Refund Requests for 2018; 2019 Claim Also Denied
- Netherlands to Increase Late Payment Interest Rate to 4.3% from January 2026
- Parcel from China on average € 6 more expensive from January 2026
