- The court ruled that the payment agreed in the settlement was not for parts of the business already transferred in 2014.
- Article 37d of the Dutch VAT Act 1968 does not apply to the payment received by X VOF.
- The name “B” and the software were intentionally not transferred in 2014, and this was acknowledged by both parties.
- The 2019 settlement agreement does not change this assessment.
- The appeal by X VOF was dismissed.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
- Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over VAT Refund Requests for 2018; 2019 Claim Also Denied
- Netherlands to Increase Late Payment Interest Rate to 4.3% from January 2026
- Payment received: no compensation for transfer of totality of assets
- Parcel from China on average € 6 more expensive from January 2026














