- The taxpayer, a sole proprietor, claimed input VAT deductions, which the FTA corrected.
- The taxpayer failed to prove certain expenses (bank deposit, legal fees, second vehicle) were business-related.
- The FTA was justified in making discretionary assessments due to missing documentation and in allocating expenses to different periods.
- Vehicle expenses were correctly estimated, with private shares attributed to the business van.
- The taxpayer’s appeal was dismissed; the FTA’s corrections were upheld.
Source: bvger.weblaw.ch
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Switzerland"
- Swiss VAT Rules for Foreign Digital Service Providers: Registration, Compliance, and Key Thresholds
- Switzerland Delays VAT Rate Increase to 2028 Amid Legislative Challenges
- VAT on Economic Transfer Upheld; Appeal Partially Granted Due to Statute of Limitations for 2013-2014
- Swiss POS, Fiscal, and VAT Requirements: Receipts, Reporting, Online Sales, and Consumer Rights Overview
- New FTA Notification Rules: Key Changes and Impacts on Real Estate Transactions Effective 2025













