- Fitters were independent contractors, not employees.
- Customers had the freedom to choose any fitter.
- Contracts accurately reflected the commercial arrangement.
- United Carpets only supplied goods, not fitting services.
- Marketing language is less important than the actual substance of the transaction.
Source: deeksvat.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- HMRC Guidance: Partial exemption (VAT Notice 706)
- HMRC Collection: VAT manuals for HMRC staff
- Supreme Court Confirms No VAT Recovery on Professional Fees for Exempt Share Sales – Hotel La Tour Case
- ICS2 Required for Goods Moved from Great Britain to Northern Ireland or EU from 2026
- HMRC Updates VAT Group Registration Rules: New Criteria for Revenue Protection Powers
