- The ECJ ruled that VAT exemption for intra-Community supplies cannot be refused solely due to missing or incomplete formal evidence if it is objectively established that the supply actually took place.
- Art. 45a CIR does not provide an exhaustive list of acceptable evidence; other forms of proof may be used if standard documents are missing.
- Tax authorities must consider all evidence submitted by the taxpayer to verify the existence of an intra-Community supply but are not required to collect evidence themselves.
- The decision reinforces that material requirements (actual movement of goods) take precedence over formal documentation requirements.
- In Germany, alternative evidence for intra-Community supplies has already been accepted, and the ruling aligns with existing practice.
Source: kmlz.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Dutch Supreme Court Seeks CJEU Ruling on VAT for Newly Built Leased Property Transfers
- Blog: Getting Digital Reporting Requirements Right: Key Recommendations for Harmonizing VAT Reporting Under ViDA
- EU VAT Expert Group – Minutes of the 41th meeting – Explanatory Notes DRR discussed
- Group of the Future of VAT – Minutes 50th meeting – October 20, 2025
- Preliminary questions to the ECJ in VAT case on the application of the transfer of a totality of assets













