- Core question: Case C-515/24 examines whether Spain could introduce VAT deduction limitations at the moment of EU accession under the standstill clause in Article 176 of the VAT Directive.
- AG Kokott’s opinion: Spain’s simultaneous introduction of VAT and its limitations is permissible under the standstill clause because, before accession, Spain had no VAT system; thus, the exclusion was “provided for” in national law at accession, satisfying the directive’s requirements.
- Implications: If upheld, the opinion confirms Spain’s restrictions on entertainment expense deductions and sets a precedent allowing new member states to apply proportionate limitations at accession, preserving VAT neutrality and coherence.
Source International Tax Review
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
- Podcasts & briefing documents: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify
Click on the logo to visit the website
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU VAT Data Exchange Divides Members, Hindering Digital Tax Future
- Recent ECJ and General Court VAT Jurisprudence and Implications for EU Compliance – March 2026
- Comments on T-221/25: EU General Court confirms (former) Belgian VAT treatment of travel outside the EU
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 1 Judgment, 2 AG Opinions till April 30, 2026
- EU Courts Reshape Transfer Pricing’s Impact on Indirect Taxes














