- The ECJ ruled that transfer pricing adjustments can constitute consideration for a taxable supply of services if there is a reciprocal legal relationship and identifiable benefits.
- In the Arcomet case, payments made under an intra-group agreement were found to be actual consideration for commercial services provided, thus subject to VAT.
- The Court clarified that the variable or conditional nature of payments does not break the direct link required for VAT if the terms are contractually agreed and quantifiable.
- Tax authorities may require necessary and proportionate evidence beyond invoices to assess the right to deduct input VAT.
- Not all transfer pricing adjustments are automatically subject to VAT; it depends on the specific arrangement and whether reciprocal obligations and benefits exist.
Source: ggi.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU VAT Rate Changes in 2026: Key Updates for Finland, Lithuania, and Germany
- Amazon Phases Out Commingling: New FNSKU Barcodes Reshape Fulfilment and VAT Compliance
- Delayed EN 16931 Standard Leaves Businesses in Limbo – A Call for Urgent Action
- The EU Commission proposes new collaborative measures in view of ViDA
- How did the EU Member States implemented ”Domestic Reverse-Charge” (Art. 194 of the Directive 2006/112)?













