- The ECJ ruled that a company’s self-initiated efforts to recover its own funds do not constitute a taxable supply of services for VAT purposes.
- Svilosa, a Bulgarian holding company, hired lawyers to recover money lent to a foundation, but received no remuneration or request from the foundation.
- The Court clarified that a taxable supply requires a direct link between service and payment; Svilosa acted solely to protect its own interests.
- The Court rejected the idea that Svilosa’s actions were a “free supply” for non-business purposes, affirming they were linked to its economic activity.
- The case confirms that VAT applies only where there is reciprocity (service for payment), not for unilateral, business-motivated actions.
Source: ggi.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EDPS Opinion on EPPO and OLAF Access to VAT Data for Combating EU Fraud
- EU Agrees on Temporary €3 Customs Duty for Low-Value E-Commerce Parcels from July 2026
- New InfoCuria case-law database and search tool
- New General Court VAT case – C-903/25 (Grotta Nuova) – No details known yet
- New General Court VAT case – C-914/25 (Modelo Continente Hipermercados) – No details known yet













