- State Secretary Heijnen responds to the Vermeer motion regarding the Significant APE study on the VAT increase for accommodation from 1-1-2026.
- The response addresses how behavioral effects were considered in the revenue estimates.
- Both the House of Representatives and the Senate received the same letter.
Source: rijksoverheid.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Settlement on VAT Revision for City Office Limits Refund, Court Awards €33,105 Plus Statutory Interest
- Dutch Court: Fiscal Representation Cannot Be Required for VAT Zero-Rate Where Mutual Assistance Exists
- Supreme Court Refers VAT Deduction Dispute on Mixed Costs in Financial Instruments to Hague Court
- No VAT Deduction Allowed for ICT Manager’s Mobile Phone Bundles, Court Rules
- No Penalty for Lack of Intent in Dutch VAT Non-Payment, Supreme Court Rules
