- The Upper Tribunal clarified that VAT exemption for medical care depends on the “principal purpose” of the treatment—whether it is primarily therapeutic or cosmetic.
- Cosmetic procedures can be exempt if their main purpose is to treat a disease or health disorder, but not if done mainly for aesthetic reasons.
- A multi-factorial analysis is required, considering diagnosis, procedure nature, symptoms, context, and perspectives of both client and practitioner.
- The Tribunal found the previous standard for evidence of diagnosis was too high and that a formal, detailed diagnosis is not always necessary.
- The case was sent back for reconsideration, and clinics are advised to carefully assess the principal purpose of their treatments.
Source: vita-uk.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- HMRC Updates Guidance on Lost VAT Appeals: New Cases Added and Amended
- VAT Recovery Falls Despite Increased Crackdown on Business Tax Avoidance, HMRC Figures Show
- VAT Late Filing Penalties: Software Failure and Employee Error Not Reasonable Excuse, Appeal Dismissed
- Corrupt Directors Jailed for £20m VAT Fraud After Secret Meetings and Fake Offshore Schemes
- VAT Exemption for Aesthetic Medicine: When Do Cosmetic Treatments Qualify as Medical Care?














