- The Upper Tribunal clarified that VAT exemption for medical care depends on the “principal purpose” of the treatment—whether it is primarily therapeutic or cosmetic.
- Cosmetic procedures can be exempt if their main purpose is to treat a disease or health disorder, but not if done mainly for aesthetic reasons.
- A multi-factorial analysis is required, considering diagnosis, procedure nature, symptoms, context, and perspectives of both client and practitioner.
- The Tribunal found the previous standard for evidence of diagnosis was too high and that a formal, detailed diagnosis is not always necessary.
- The case was sent back for reconsideration, and clinics are advised to carefully assess the principal purpose of their treatments.
Source: vita-uk.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Budget 2025: VAT E-Invoicing, Digital Compliance, and Post-Brexit Tax Reforms Announced
- FTT Rules HMRC Closure Notice Bars VAT Registration: Hairdresser’s Turnover Below Threshold, Appeal Allowed
- UK Tribunal Rules Self-Employed Hairdresser Not Liable for VAT Registration Under Rent-a-Chair Model
- EU Insists on VAT Representative for UK Firms Despite British Objections to Import Rules
- Mandatory B2B e-invoicing as of April 2029














