- The case concerns the pro rata deduction of input VAT for mixed-use goods and services.
- The default method for deduction is based on the turnover ratio (omzetmethode), unless actual use can be objectively and accurately demonstrated.
- The burden of proof for deviating from the turnover method lies with the party seeking to use the actual use method.
- The tax inspector applied the turnover method, but the taxpayer argues that actual use (based on office space and time spent on exempt activities) provides a more accurate basis for deduction.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Despite the absence of a tax representative, the application of the zero rate
- Comments on T-184/25: Transfers of credit portfolios and VAT: AG puts credit management exemption under pressure
- New Four-Year VAT Adjustment for Investment Services on Real Estate Starting 2026
- VAT refund rightly refused due to unproven previous payment
- VAT Rules for Unpaid Invoices: When Can Entrepreneurs Reclaim or Repay VAT?














