- The case concerns the pro rata deduction of input VAT for mixed-use goods and services.
- The default method for deduction is based on the turnover ratio (omzetmethode), unless actual use can be objectively and accurately demonstrated.
- The burden of proof for deviating from the turnover method lies with the party seeking to use the actual use method.
- The tax inspector applied the turnover method, but the taxpayer argues that actual use (based on office space and time spent on exempt activities) provides a more accurate basis for deduction.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Hospice performance does not qualify as exempt service or short stay
- Assessment of Dispute: Single or Multiple Services in Hospice Guest Care and Tax Implications
- Netherlands Suspends €2 Handling Fee on Non-EU Parcels, Awaits EU Customs Measures in 2026
- Decision on the introduction of a national handling fee postponed
- No VAT Fiscal Unity Without Financial Integration, Rules Advocate General Ettema














