- The case concerns the pro rata deduction of input VAT for mixed-use goods and services.
- The default method for deduction is based on the turnover ratio (omzetmethode), unless actual use can be objectively and accurately demonstrated.
- The burden of proof for deviating from the turnover method lies with the party seeking to use the actual use method.
- The tax inspector applied the turnover method, but the taxpayer argues that actual use (based on office space and time spent on exempt activities) provides a more accurate basis for deduction.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Court Rules Outsourced Payment Processing Qualifies for VAT Exemption
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Head Spa Treatments at Hairdressers, Dutch Tax Group Rules
- Comments on ECJ C-232/24: Both factoring but also invoice financing subject to VAT
- Netherlands Plans Mandatory Peppol-Based B2B E-Invoicing Regime by July 2030
- Netherlands Tourism at Risk: Experts Warn VAT Hike Could Harm Industry and Economy













