- The Court of Appeal ruled against Hippodrome Casino Ltd (HCL) in a dispute over the calculation of recoverable input VAT, affirming that the taxpayer failed to demonstrate that a floorspace-based Standard Method Override (SMO) provided a more accurate reflection of economic use compared to the standard method, which remains the default for VAT apportionment.
- The Court upheld the Upper Tribunal’s decision to reject HCL’s floorspace method, stating that the taxpayer did not sufficiently address HMRC’s argument regarding the dual economic use of areas supporting both taxable and exempt supplies, ultimately concluding that the standard method was not displaced.
- Additionally, the Court confirmed that Article 5 of the Input Tax Order restricts recovery of input tax related to business entertainment uniformly, without consideration of the entertainment’s purpose, thus supporting HMRC’s approach to VAT apportionment and rejecting HCL’s proposal for a more complex commercial apportionment method.
Source KPMG
- Court of Appeal dismissed Hippodrome Casino’s VAT appeal, upholding decisions by Upper Tribunal and HMRC regarding recovery of residual input VAT
- Casino argued for floor space method over standard turnover based method to calculate VAT deductions for mixed taxable and exempt activities like restaurants, bars and gambling
- HMRC rejected the proposed floor space override, stating it did not represent a more fair or reasonable result than the standard method
- Court affirmed that standard method is statutory default and taxpayers must demonstrate compelling evidence for alternative methods to be more precise
- Decision reinforces that partial exemption remains complex and courts reluctant to deviate from legislative defaults without strong justification across all business sectors
Source: xeinadin.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- VAT Exemption for Medical vs Cosmetic Treatments: Key Tribunal Guidance for Clinics and Practitioners
- HMRC Updates Guidance on Lost VAT Appeals: New Cases Added and Amended
- VAT Recovery Falls Despite Increased Crackdown on Business Tax Avoidance, HMRC Figures Show
- VAT Late Filing Penalties: Software Failure and Employee Error Not Reasonable Excuse, Appeal Dismissed
- Corrupt Directors Jailed for £20m VAT Fraud After Secret Meetings and Fake Offshore Schemes














