- Information provided to the end customer after purchase about the supplier’s identity does not exclude the application of Article 28 of the VAT Directive.
- Disclosure of the principal’s identity in order confirmations post-purchase does not prevent classification as intermediary in own name under Article 28.
- Other relevant circumstances must indicate that the conditions for applying Article 28 are met.
- Reference: Case C‑101/24, Xyrality GmbH, points 41 and 45.
Source: www4.skatteverket.se
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Sweden"
- Sweden Launches Review of E-Invoicing and Digital VAT Reporting Under EU ViDA Rules
- Sweden to Replace IDEP.web with New Intrastat Data Collection Platform in 2026
- Swedish Tax Court Clarifies VAT on Leased Mobile Housing Modules Used as Temporary Residences
- Swedish Tax Court: Input VAT Deduction Allowed for Garage Separate from Permanent Residence
- VAT on Transfer of Wind Turbine Project Documentation: New Tax Agency Position 2026














