Blog Luc Dhont: How Can Multinationals Comply with VAT on Transfer Pricing Adjustments Post-ECJ Arcomet?

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the organization with which the author is affiliated. This article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice. Readers are encouraged to seek guidance from qualified professionals regarding their specific circumstances.

Transfer Pricing Adjustments: Origin and Relation to VAT

A Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment is a concept primarily defined by the OECD for direct tax purposes and is not addressed or explicitly defined within the EU VAT Directive 2006/112/EC or its Implementing Regulation. Under OECD guidelines, TP adjustments aim to ensure that the taxable profits of an entity within a multinational group reflect an arm’s length margin, consistent with intercompany agreements and, where applicable, approvals with tax authorities. Fundamentally, this process seeks to align reported profits for direct tax purposes with market conditions, thereby preventing profit shifting and erosion of the tax base.

In contrast, within VAT law, the TP adjustment serves a different purpose: it aims to adjust the taxable amount of goods or services originally invoiced between related parties at the time of the transaction. Although the driver for the adjustment stems from direct tax principles, the VAT aspect pertains to properly reflecting the transaction’s consideration for VAT purposes.

Consequently, TP adjustments must be recognized as corrections to the value upon which VAT was calculated and invoiced initially. This duality—that the adjustment originates from direct tax concepts but must adhere to VAT invoicing and reporting rules—creates operational complexity, especially for multinational groups. The recent ECJ judgment in case C-726/23, Arcomet, highlights this intricacy and emphasizes that such adjustments are taxable events under EU VAT law.

The ECJ Judgment on VAT and Transfer Pricing Adjustments: Case C-726/23 Arcomet

Introduction

The European Court of Justice (ECJ)’s ruling in case C-726/23, Arcomet, offers critical guidance on the VAT treatment of TP adjustments concerning intra-group services among related parties within the EU. This article examines the facts, raises key legal questions, summarizes the ECJ’s decision, and discusses the practical challenges multinational companies face when applying this judgment, closing with reflections on policy and administrative impacts.

Facts and Legal Context

Arcomet, a multinational operating across multiple EU Member States and outside the EU, holds several VAT registrations and centrally manages goods and services across its group companies. During year-end financial closing, deviations from expected profit margins prompted the group to issue transfer pricing credit notes to adjust intra-group service invoices. The tax authorities challenged whether these TP adjustments, reflected via credit notes, constitute taxable VAT events under EU law.

Legal Issue and Questions Referred

The national court asked the ECJ to clarify:

• Whether TP adjustments, reflecting intra-group service transactions, trigger a new taxable event under VAT law.
• If such adjustments require issuance of VAT-compliant correction invoices (credit or debit notes).
• The extent to which these financial corrections need to be linked, justified, and documented concerning the original supplies.
• How to correctly determine the VAT base and manage VAT reporting obligations across multiple intra-group transactions in various Member States.

ECJ’s Ruling

The ECJ clarified that:

• TP adjustments made after the original supply date, and reflected through credit or debit notes, are indeed taxable transactions under the VAT Directive.
• These adjustments are considered supplementary taxable events and must be subject to VAT following the rules for intra-EU services.
• Issuance of credit/debit notes is mandatory to ensure proper VAT invoicing and compliance.
• Every adjustment must be justified, documented, and connected to the initial invoice to maintain clarity and adherence to VAT rules.

In essence, the ECJ reasserted that VAT applies to all modifications of the taxable amount arising from intra-group supply adjustments, confirming that such corrections are taxable events, with corresponding invoicing requirements.

Business Context: VAT and Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Multinational Operations

Imagine a multinational manufacturing group with production plants scattered across several EU countries and beyond. The group operates under a centralized principal company that holds VAT registrations in multiple Member States. Finished goods are shipped from various storage locations to a network of distributors throughout Europe.

Throughout the year, these distributors buy products at agreed transfer prices from the principal company. However, due to market fluctuations, exchange rate variations, and unforeseen administrative costs, the expected margins and costs do not materialize exactly as planned.

At year-end, the group must adjust prices retrospectively through transfer pricing credit notes to ensure compliance with arm’s length principles and intercompany agreements. This creates a challenge: these TP adjustments affect the taxable amount originally invoiced and raise urgent questions about VAT treatment.

Practical Challenges for Multinational Companies

While the Arcomet ruling appears straightforward for simple service transactions, its practical implications for businesses are significant:

• Complex Supply Chains: Multinational groups often operate manufacturing plants across multiple EU countries and outside, with goods stored in various locations. The principal sells goods through multiple channels, which can involve numerous “ship-from” and “ship-to” configurations affecting VAT’s place of supply.
• Handling Frequent Intra-Group Transactions: If, for example, a company’s daily or weekly sales fluctuate in price, the number of TP adjustments—and consequently, correction invoices—can become vast. Each fluctuation might require issuing credit notes and revising VAT calculations for a host of individual transactions.
• Reissuance of Invoices and VAT Returns: The handling of ongoing adjustments introduces significant logistical and administrative hurdles. Given the range and volume of transactions, this might entail reissuing or amending invoices retrospectively, leading to multiple VAT filings and corrections for each taxable period.
• Digital Reporting Requirements: Under “VAT in the Digital Age,” many Member States implement real-time or near real-time electronic VAT reporting. This means every adjustment must be reflected accurately in transactional data submissions, increasing administrative burdens. If adjustments are frequent, businesses may need to reissue invoices or submit amendments constantly, complicating compliance and increasing risk of penalties.
• Cost and Administrative Burden: Handling the VAT implications of TP adjustments as taxable transactions involves considerable operational costs and resource allocation. While both parties retain the right to deduct VAT, the process of correcting multiple invoices, submitting amended returns, and maintaining detailed documentation is burdensome.
• Proportionality and Practicality Concerns: Given these challenges, the strict application of the ECJ’s ruling may produce disproportionate costs relative to the revenue involved. This supports arguments for adopting more pragmatic solutions that respect VAT neutrality and proportionality, especially considering that both parties can recover VAT if the adjustments are correctly documented.

Consideration of the VAT Expert Group’s Opinion

• To mitigate operational strain, the EU VAT Expert Group (Working Paper 071) in April 2018 considering transfer pricing adjustments as “outside the scope of VAT” if both companies have full VAT recovery rights on initial supplies. This approach could simplify compliance, reduce administrative costs, and preserve VAT neutrality, aligning with broader policy objectives.

Legal and Policy Reflections

• The ECJ’s ruling reaffirms the principle that any financial adjustment affecting the consideration for a taxable supply should itself be taxable under VAT law, maintaining the legal integrity of VAT as a consumption tax. Yet, the operational realities—especially in complex, high-frequency intra-group relationships—highlight potential tensions between legal clarity and administrative feasibility.
• Policymakers and tax authorities should consider developing flexible, technology-enabled frameworks (like integrated electronic reporting systems) to manage TP adjustments efficiently. Emphasizing VAT neutrality, proportionality, and administrative simplicity is crucial to ensuring that tax compliance supports economic activity without undue burdens.

Conclusion

• The ECJ judgment in Arcomet (C-726/23) confirms that transfer pricing adjustments for intra-group service transactions are subject to VAT and require corresponding correction invoices and reporting. While legally sound, this approach imposes significant administrative and operational burdens on companies managing multiple, frequent intra-group transactions.
• In practice, detailed documentation, precise calculation, and timely correction procedures are vital. However, to balance compliance with administrability, a more pragmatic approach—possibly exempting certain TP adjustments from VAT scope—should be considered, especially given the high costs and the principles of VAT neutrality and proportionality.