- The Supreme Court ruled that X’s activities for the foundation do not constitute an indivisible supply with the VAT-exempt services he provides as a general practitioner, meaning they are not included under the same exemption.
- The Court clarified that while the foundation’s services are exempt due to its partnership status since January 1, 2016, this does not extend to services provided by third parties to the foundation for remuneration.
- X’s appeal was ultimately dismissed, but he was awarded €2000 in compensation for delays exceeding a reasonable period in the legal proceedings.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Settlement on VAT Revision for City Office Limits Refund, Court Awards €33,105 Plus Statutory Interest
- Dutch Court: Fiscal Representation Cannot Be Required for VAT Zero-Rate Where Mutual Assistance Exists
- Supreme Court Refers VAT Deduction Dispute on Mixed Costs in Financial Instruments to Hague Court
- No VAT Deduction Allowed for ICT Manager’s Mobile Phone Bundles, Court Rules
- No Penalty for Lack of Intent in Dutch VAT Non-Payment, Supreme Court Rules
