- A BV cannot claim VAT deduction for a luxury apartment intended for partial office use.
- The court ruled the BV failed to prove exclusive business use of the property.
- The apartment was rented to a subsidiary as office space but retained residential characteristics.
- The BV’s appeal for VAT deduction was denied due to lack of evidence for non-residential use.
Source: fiscaalvanmorgen.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Court Rules Outsourced Payment Processing Qualifies for VAT Exemption
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Head Spa Treatments at Hairdressers, Dutch Tax Group Rules
- Comments on ECJ C-232/24: Both factoring but also invoice financing subject to VAT
- Netherlands Plans Mandatory Peppol-Based B2B E-Invoicing Regime by July 2030
- Netherlands Tourism at Risk: Experts Warn VAT Hike Could Harm Industry and Economy
