- The Supreme Administrative Court overturned a first instance judgment in a tax carousel fraud case, establishing important precedents for burden of proof requirements
- The court ruled that tax authorities must prove their claims when alleging a taxpayer knowingly participated in tax fraud, and that fraud by one entity does not automatically contaminate the entire transaction chain
- Each participant in a transaction chain must be assessed individually, with conclusions applying only to the specific taxpayer under scrutiny rather than all parties involved
- Tax authorities cannot arbitrarily switch between accusations of knowing participation in fraud versus failure to exercise due diligence without proper analysis and evidence
- This ruling significantly limits the previous practice where tax authorities would alternate between different accusations to avoid having to prove taxpayer awareness of fraudulent activity
Source: mddp.pl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Poland"
- No VAT Applies Without Direct Reciprocal Service, Court Rules on Film Production Funding
- KSeF for Small Businesses: Who Qualifies for the Postponement and When Does It Apply?
- Municipality Can Deduct VAT on Swimming Pool Using Its Own Method, Court Rules
- Poland Proposes JPK_VAT Amendments to Align with KSeF, New Reporting Rules from 2026
- KSeF and Transfer Pricing Adjustments: Navigating New Transparency and Compliance Challenges for Capital Groups














