- The Münster Tax Court ruled on input tax deduction in a case where a taxpayer was involved in a tax evasion chain despite taking security measures to prevent involvement in VAT fraud systems
- Input tax deduction must be denied on material grounds when objective circumstances show the taxpayer knew or could have known they were participating in transactions involving VAT evasion
- The taxpayer had implemented security measures to avoid being incorporated into a VAT fraud system, but these very measures provided evidence suggesting the main supplier was a buffer in a VAT carousel scheme
- The main supplier allegedly reduced their VAT liability through cover invoices as part of the fraudulent scheme
- The determination of whether someone should have known about involvement in VAT fraud depends solely on objective circumstances that create a duty to investigate for the taxpayer
Source: datenbank.nwb.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- VAT Identification Number and Confirmation Request – Revision Admitted for Legal Clarification
- Comments on ECJ C-101/24 (Xyrality) – VAT Treatment of Mobile App Services Before 2015
- ECJ C-101/24 ( XYRALITY) – Judgment – German developer is not liable for VAT on services via an app store
- e-Invoicing in Germany: Guidelines, Timeline, Scope, Requirements & Format
- Accidental Double Taxation Due to IOSS and § 21a UStG Application on Same Transaction