Understanding VAT Zero Rating Challenges: Lessons from the H Ripley & Co Ltd Case

• Exporting goods from the UK can be complex despite the apparent simplicity of VAT zero rating.
• The Ripley case shows the importance of complete and accurate evidence for zero rating.
• Ripley exported scrap metal to Belgium and zero rated the sales, but HMRC challenged due to insufficient evidence.
• The Tribunal supported HMRC, as Ripley’s evidence did not meet legal standards.
• Evidence issues included unsigned CMRs, unlinked ferry bookings, late documentation, and missing identifiers.
• VAT Notice 725 requires goods to leave the UK within three months, with sufficient evidence.
• Evidence must be official or commercial, complete, consistent, and timely.
• Key lessons include the importance of evidence over the fact of export, timely documentation, and quality of evidence.
• Exporters should maintain a compliance calendar, ensure complete documentation, and cross-reference all related documents.

Source: deeksvat.co.uk

Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.

---

---