- UK Supreme Court dismissed Prudential’s appeal regarding VAT grouping and time of supply.
- The case involved the relationship between VAT grouping provisions and time of supply rules.
- The Court ruled that time of supply, not actual performance date, determines VAT group relief applicability.
- Silverfleet Capital invoiced Prudential for success fees after leaving the VAT group.
- HMRC argued success fees crystallized on invoicing, not during group membership.
- The First-tier Tribunal sided with Prudential, but HMRC won in higher courts.
- Supreme Court upheld HMRC’s position, confirming regulation 90’s application to continuous supplies.
- The Court stated VAT grouping relief does not cover contingent payments after leaving the group.
- Time of supply rules take precedence over actual performance timing for VAT purposes.
Source: vatcalc.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- HMRC Policy paper: Budget 2025 document
- Briefing document & Podcast: E-Invoicing & E-Reporting in the United Kingdom: Scope and Implementation Overview
- Mandatory B2B e-invoicing as of April 2029
- UK Budget 2025: HMRC Eases VAT Rules for UK Businesses with EU Branches
- Budget 2025: Government Bans VAT Loophole for Uber, Bolt and Ride-Hailing Apps














