- Supreme Court ruled in favor of HMRC in Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v HMRC on 11 September 2025
- Case impacts VAT treatment of intra group supplies and VAT grouping rules
- Dispute involved investment management services between Silverfleet Capital Ltd and Prudential Assurance Company Ltd
- Both entities were in the same VAT group when services were performed
- Payments were invoiced and paid after Silverfleet Capital Ltd left the VAT group
- HMRC argued VAT was chargeable based on timing of invoice or payment
- Court of Appeal supported HMRC’s position, stating VAT was due
- Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeal’s ruling
- Businesses may face VAT charges on intra group services due to timing of invoicing or payment
- Ruling affects large corporate and financial institutions with intra group service arrangements
- Raises questions about VAT group protection when corporate structures change
- Impacts financial services sector and businesses using VAT grouping to avoid irrecoverable VAT costs
Source: deeksvat.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- VAT Input Tax Denial Under Kittel Principle – Appeals Allowed Against HMRC
- SK Metals Ltd v HMRC: VAT Input Tax Deductibility and MTIC Fraud Knowledge
- UK Chancellor Considers VAT Rate Adjustments and Threshold Changes in Upcoming Budget
- Upper Tribunal Rules Cosmetic Treatments by Medical Professionals Can Qualify for VAT Exemption
- High Court Rules Interest Payable on VAT in Contract Dispute Settlement