- The Federal Supreme Court ruled that the payments made to the complainant by SDC were subsidies, not part of a supply relationship under the VAT Act. The appellant’s claim of providing services in return for payment was rejected, as the program was initiated and implemented independently by the appellant, with SDC only providing co-financing. The taxpayer’s appeal was dismissed.
Source: bvger.weblaw.ch
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Switzerland"
- Federal Council Proposes Extending 3.8% VAT Rate for Accommodation Until 2035
- Swiss Federal Tax Administration Announces 2026 Interest Rate Changes for Various Taxes Effective January 1
- FTA Announces New Federal Tax Refund and Default Interest Rates Effective 2026
- FTA Enables Direct Online Adjustments for VAT Settlement Modalities
- Taxpayer’s Appeal Dismissed: Portfolio Management Commissions Not a Reduction in Remuneration Under VAT Act