- The Federal Supreme Court ruled that the payments made to the complainant by SDC were subsidies, not part of a supply relationship under the VAT Act. The appellant’s claim of providing services in return for payment was rejected, as the program was initiated and implemented independently by the appellant, with SDC only providing co-financing. The taxpayer’s appeal was dismissed.
Source: bvger.weblaw.ch
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Switzerland"
- Federal Administrative Court Decision on VAT Input Tax Deduction Timing for 2020 Tax Period
- Federal Administrative Court Confirms Input Tax Deduction Reduction, Classifies SFOE Payments as Subsidies
- Swiss Federal Administrative Court Rules on VAT Reference Tax for Reinsurance Services
- Federal Administrative Court Confirms VAT Liability for Electronic Services from 2015-2020
- FAC Partially Upholds Appeal on VAT Dispute Over Vehicle Use and Travel Expenses, 2014-2018
