- ECJ ruled that transfer pricing adjustments by a principal company are services subject to VAT.
- The ruling was made in the Arcomet Towercranes case on 4 September 2025.
- Charges ensuring an operating company’s profit margin within an arm’s length range are considered remuneration for services.
- Tax authorities can request additional evidence to verify services supplied and used for taxable activities.
- Arcomet Belgium, the parent company, issued equalization invoices to Arcomet Romania without VAT.
- Romanian tax authorities denied VAT deductions on some invoices and collected additional VAT on others.
- The Court of Appeal in Bucharest referred questions to the ECJ about VAT application and documentation requirements.
- The Advocate-General confirmed that invoiced amounts are payments for services within VAT scope and supported additional documentation requirements.
Source: taxathand.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJ Rules on Customs Valuation for Imports with Provisional Prices: Tauritus Case (C-782/23)
- EDPS Opinion on EPPO and OLAF Access to VAT Data for Combating EU Fraud
- EU Agrees on Temporary €3 Customs Duty for Low-Value E-Commerce Parcels from July 2026
- New InfoCuria case-law database and search tool
- New General Court VAT case – C-903/25 (Grotta Nuova) – No details known yet













