The ECJ ruled that non-transactional profit adjustments charged by a principal company to an operating company are considered services within the scope of VAT. The case involved Arcomet Belgium and Arcomet Romania, where the Romanian tax authorities challenged the VAT treatment of these adjustments. The ECJ confirmed that such charges are payments for services subject to VAT and that member states can impose documentation requirements to support VAT recovery on intragroup services.
Source: deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Delayed EN 16931 Standard Leaves Businesses in Limbo – A Call for Urgent Action
- The EU Commission proposes new collaborative measures in view of ViDA
- How did the EU Member States implemented ”Domestic Reverse-Charge” (Art. 194 of the Directive 2006/112)?
- ECJ/General Court VAT Cases – Pending cases
- ECJ VAT Cases decided in 2025
