The ECJ ruled that non-transactional profit adjustments charged by a principal company to an operating company are considered services within the scope of VAT. The case involved Arcomet Belgium and Arcomet Romania, where the Romanian tax authorities challenged the VAT treatment of these adjustments. The ECJ confirmed that such charges are payments for services subject to VAT and that member states can impose documentation requirements to support VAT recovery on intragroup services.
Source: deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ Upholds Czech Joint VAT Liability in Fuel Fraud Case, Validates EU Law Compliance
- CJEU Rules on VAT for Transfer Price Adjustments in Arcomet Towercranes Case C-726/23
- Agenda of the ECJ VAT cases – 4 AG Opinions, 1 Hearings till October 10, 2025
- Non-Payment of Declared VAT Not Considered VAT Fraud, Says Advocate General Kokott
- CJEU Confirms TP Adjustments as VAT-Applicable Services, Requires Supporting Documentation
