The ECJ ruled that non-transactional profit adjustments charged by a principal company to an operating company are considered services within the scope of VAT. The case involved Arcomet Belgium and Arcomet Romania, where the Romanian tax authorities challenged the VAT treatment of these adjustments. The ECJ confirmed that such charges are payments for services subject to VAT and that member states can impose documentation requirements to support VAT recovery on intragroup services.
Source: deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Recent ECJ/General Court VAT Jurisprudence and Implications for EU Compliance (Sept 2025)
- Implementing a ViDA Implementation Strategy – What Should You Know?
- ECJ VAT Cases decided in 2025
- ECJ C-535/24 (Svilosa) – Judgment – Acts by a creditor to recover debt without debtor’s mandate aren’t classified as ‘supply of services’
- ViDA Risks: Key Concerns Highlighted by the European Commission
