The ECJ ruled that non-transactional profit adjustments charged by a principal company to an operating company are considered services within the scope of VAT. The case involved Arcomet Belgium and Arcomet Romania, where the Romanian tax authorities challenged the VAT treatment of these adjustments. The ECJ confirmed that such charges are payments for services subject to VAT and that member states can impose documentation requirements to support VAT recovery on intragroup services.
Source: deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJ Rules on Customs Valuation for Imports with Provisional Prices: Tauritus Case (C-782/23)
- EDPS Opinion on EPPO and OLAF Access to VAT Data for Combating EU Fraud
- EU Agrees on Temporary €3 Customs Duty for Low-Value E-Commerce Parcels from July 2026
- New InfoCuria case-law database and search tool
- New General Court VAT case – C-903/25 (Grotta Nuova) – No details known yet
