- Case involved the assessment of VAT liability based on bank deposits
- Appellants claimed deposits were payments for VAT-exempt tattoo services
- Appellants presented an expert statement and photos as evidence
- Court found appellants did not prove the assessment was unreasonable or incorrect
- Appellants failed to maintain proper accounting records as required by law
- No objective evidence linked deposits to specific tattoo services
- Lower court’s decision to dismiss the case was upheld
Source: info.skat.dk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
