- The ECJ addressed the P-GmbH case twice, initially ruling that excessive VAT shown to final consumers does not create VAT liability.
- P-GmbH applied a high VAT rate in invoices to unnamed customers, assumed to be final consumers.
- The Austrian Federal Finance Court estimated that 0.5 percent of invoices were to taxable persons, leading to a VAT liability.
- The Austrian tax authority appealed, seeking clarification on invoices issued to both final consumers and taxable persons.
- The ECJ confirmed that each invoice must be assessed individually for VAT liability.
- “Final consumer” is narrowly defined as non-taxable persons.
- In mass transactions, estimation is allowed but must be based on objective and verifiable data.
- Taxpayers must have the opportunity to contest estimates before any adverse decision.
Source: kmlz.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on ”Free Products” (Art. 16)
- Briefing document & Podcast: C-438/13 (BCR Leasing Case) – Relief for Leasing Firms Facing Asset Non-Recovery
- VAT Neutrality and Tax Fraud: Implications of Recent Jurisprudence
- Blog Luc Dhont: How Can Multinationals Comply with VAT on Transfer Pricing Adjustments Post-ECJ Arcomet?
- ECJ Opinion Sheds Light on VAT for Ancillary Services in German Accommodation Sector