- The Upper Tribunal issued a decision on mini umbrella companies and their use of VAT flat rate scheme and annual employment allowance.
- Thousands of other appeals are on hold pending the outcome of these lead cases.
- HMRC deregistered the MUCs from VAT, claiming the scheme was fraudulent.
- HMRC issued assessments denying MUCs the use of the FRS and EA.
- The First-tier Tribunal found HMRC had objective grounds but could not prove MUC directors knew of the fraud.
- The FTT supported HMRC’s decision to deny FRS and EA benefits to MUCs.
- Both HMRC and MUCs appealed the FTT decision.
- The Upper Tribunal ruled HMRC did not need to prove MUC directors’ knowledge of fraud for deregistration.
- The UT agreed with HMRC and FTT on denying FRS and EA benefits.
- HMRC’s appeal was upheld, and MUCs’ appeal was dismissed.
Source: taxscape.deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK VAT Rules on Online Prize Draws Face Scrutiny Amid New Voluntary Code and Industry Growth
- How UK Businesses Accidentally Trigger US State Sales Tax Through Ecommerce and Economic Nexus
- Director Liable for VAT Fraud and PAYE/NIC on Withdrawals: Ellis & Anor v HMRC (2026)
- UK VAT Gap Rises to £11.9bn in 2024–25, HMRC Reports 6.5% Shortfall
- Luzha v HMRC: VAT Late Submission Penalties Upheld, No Reasonable Excuse Found, Appeal Dismissed














