VATupdate

Share this post on

Tribunal Rulings Highlight VAT Exemption and HMRC Procedural Missteps in Financial Services Cases

  • Performance Leads Limited (PLL) connects people seeking financial advice with independent financial advisers (IFAs) and charges a fee for each lead.
  • PLL initially charged 20% VAT on their services, considering them standard-rated advertising.
  • PLL realized their services might qualify for VAT exemption as financial intermediary services and claimed back £247,407 in overpaid VAT.
  • HMRC argued against the exemption, stating PLL’s services were just advertising and not preparatory to contracts.
  • The Tribunal sided with PLL, recognizing their services as genuine intermediary work, qualifying for VAT exemption.
  • HMRC was criticized for introducing new arguments after agreeing on legal issues, leading to procedural criticism.
  • The case highlights the distinction between standard-rated advertising and exempt financial intermediary services.
  • Conservatory Insulations Northwest Limited (CIN) submitted a VAT error correction notice for £54,468, but HMRC lost the paperwork.
  • HMRC completed the assessment form but delayed the required senior officer’s countersignature.
  • The Tribunal ruled the assessment was made too late, allowing CIN’s appeal and resulting in a loss for HMRC.

Source: deeksvat.co.uk

Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.

Sponsors:

VATIT Compliance

Advertisements: