Decision of the ECJ
Summary
- Case Background: The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) addressed a case involving the repayment of customs duties that were wrongly collected by French customs authorities from Andorran importers between 1988 and 1991, which raised questions regarding the obligations of customs authorities under EU law.
- Key Legal Provisions: The court interpreted Article 2(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1430/79, which outlines conditions for the repayment or remission of customs duties, emphasizing that customs authorities must act on their own initiative if they establish that duties were wrongly collected within three years of their entry in the accounts.
- Obligation of Customs Authorities: The CJEU ruled that national customs authorities are required to repay customs duties if they ascertain that the duties were improperly collected, including knowing the identity of the operators and the amounts to be repaid, and must take reasonable measures to obtain any necessary information for repayment.
- Limitations on Repayment: The court clarified that while the repayment obligation must be established within the three-year period, the actual repayment may occur after this period, provided that the authorities have determined that the duties were not legally owed.
- Administrative Responsibilities: The judgment concluded that customs authorities cannot rely on a lack of information as an excuse to avoid their repayment obligations; they must take appropriate, non-disproportionate actions to gather necessary information to fulfill their duties under EU law.
Decision
The third subparagraph of Article 2(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1430/79 of 2 July 1979 on the repayment or remission of import or export duties, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3069/86 of 7 October 1986,
must be interpreted as meaning that the existence of an obligation on a national customs authority to repay customs duties on its own initiative is subject to the fact that that authority has itself established, before the expiry of a period of three years from the entry in the accounts of those duties, that those duties have been wrongly collected, that finding implying that that authority is aware of the identity of the persons who paid those duties and of the amount to be repaid to each of them. Where that authority does not have, and could not have, at its disposal all of the information necessary to make such a repayment to the person who paid the customs duties wrongly collected or to the persons who succeeded him or her in his or her rights and obligations, it is for that authority, in order to comply with its repayment obligation, to take the measures which, without being disproportionate, are necessary and appropriate in order to obtain that information and to make the repayment.
Source Curia
AG Opinion
The Advocate General’s opinion, delivered on March 6, 2025, addresses the interpretation of customs legislation, specifically concerning the conditions under which customs authorities can repay or remit incorrectly collected duties. The case involves YX and Logística i Gestió Caves Andorranes i Vidal SA against the French customs authorities regarding the repayment of customs duties that were levied due to an incorrect application of customs rules between 1988 and 1991.
Legal Framework
- Regulation No 1430/79: This regulation outlines the conditions for the repayment or remission of import and export duties. It specifies that import duties can be repaid if it is established they were not legally owed and sets a three-year time limit for applications for repayment.
- Community Customs Code: Established a uniform customs procedural law, which emphasizes the need for legal certainty and proper functioning of customs administrations, and includes similar provisions regarding repayment of wrongly collected duties.
- Union Customs Code: Reinforces the repayment process and specifies the conditions under which customs duties can be repaid, including the authorities’ obligation to initiate repayments when they discover duties were wrongly collected.
Facts and Legal Questions
- The case arose when Andorran importers, through a customs agent in France, were charged customs duties for goods imported into Andorra. The French customs authorities previously required these goods to be released for free circulation, a requirement deemed unlawful by the European Commission. The importers seek repayment for duties wrongly collected, arguing that the customs authorities have a duty to act on their own initiative to correct this.
- The Court of Cassation (France) refers two questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU):
- Whether customs authorities are limited to a three-year period for repayments or if they must establish the duties were not legally owed within that timeframe.
- Whether authorities must know the identities of operators and the amounts owed to initiate repayments without conducting extensive research.
Analysis
- Obligation to Repay: The opinion emphasizes that EU customs law mandates authorities to repay duties not owed. There are two procedures for repayment: one requiring an application by the debtor and the other allowing authorities to act on their initiative within three years of the duties being recorded.
- Three-Year Limitation Period: While there is a three-year period for submitting applications for repayment, the repayment itself can occur after this period if the necessary conditions are met within the three years, namely that the authorities recognize the duties were wrongly collected.
- Investigative Obligations: The customs authorities must proactively ensure they have the necessary information to identify the operators and the amounts owed. They should not rely solely on the operators to provide this information, especially in cases of serious administrative errors. The level of inquiry required should be proportionate to the situation’s seriousness.
- Good Administration Principles: The opinion asserts that customs authorities must adhere to principles of good administration, including the obligation to communicate effectively with operators regarding their rights and the conditions for repayment. This entails a duty to justify administrative decisions and to treat affected operators fairly.
Conclusion
- The Advocate General concludes that customs authorities must act on their own initiative to repay wrongly collected duties if they recognize the conditions for repayment within three years. They must ensure they have sufficient knowledge about the involved operators and the amounts to be repaid, while also being proactive in their investigations. This approach balances the need for legal certainty with the rights of operators under EU law, ensuring that they are not disadvantaged by administrative oversights.
Source
