- Legal Distinction Between Tools and Advisors: The German court ruling clarified that automated tools, like tax software, can provide general guidance without breaching regulations, as long as they follow fixed logic and do not offer case-specific legal advice. In contrast, tools that interpret tax rules based on personal data may cross into regulated territory.
- Limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs): LLMs, while capable of generating personalized responses, do not provide legal advice in the traditional sense. They operate as tools that predict helpful replies based on training data, without understanding legal nuances or applying laws. Users remain in control, guiding interactions and determining how to use the output.
- Evolving Role of Tax Advisors: As automation and AI become more prevalent in tax processes, tax advisors must shift their focus from being mere knowledge holders to becoming interpreters, strategists, and ethical decision-makers. The integration of AI should enhance their role rather than compete with it, emphasizing the importance of human judgment in tax compliance and advisory services.
Source Forbes