- Vendor may appeal a ruling allowing use of an alternative apportionment method not requested by the vendor
- Supreme Court of Appeal decision on July 8, 2025
- Right to appeal under section 32(1)(a)(iv) of the VAT Act
- Case: Commissioner for South African Revenue Service v. African Bank Limited
- Vendors must apply for a ruling to use an alternative method if standard methods are not equitable
- Section 32(1)(a)(iv) allows appeal if SARS refuses a method
- SARS argued approval of an alternative method prevents appeal
- Court rejected SARS’ interpretation, supporting vendor’s right to appeal
Source: kpmg.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- South Africa Considers Raising VAT Registration Threshold Amid Calls for Reform and Modernisation
- South Africa Proposes 20% National Tax on Online Gambling Revenue
- SARS Enhances VAT Registration Transparency and Communication for Applicants Starting December 2025
- VAT Fraud Syndicate Threatens South Africa’s Economy, Costs Billions in Lost Revenue and Market Share
- SARS Limits E-Commerce Imports Under Customs Code 70707070 to R150,000 Per Year for Individuals













