- Vendor may appeal a ruling allowing use of an alternative apportionment method not requested by the vendor
- Supreme Court of Appeal decision on July 8, 2025
- Right to appeal under section 32(1)(a)(iv) of the VAT Act
- Case: Commissioner for South African Revenue Service v. African Bank Limited
- Vendors must apply for a ruling to use an alternative method if standard methods are not equitable
- Section 32(1)(a)(iv) allows appeal if SARS refuses a method
- SARS argued approval of an alternative method prevents appeal
- Court rejected SARS’ interpretation, supporting vendor’s right to appeal
Source: kpmg.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- South Africa Raises VAT Threshold and Implements New Crypto Reporting Rules for 2026-2027
- SARS to Intensify Tax Collection Amid Stagnant Economy and Government Revenue Pressure
- Key VAT Changes in South Africa’s 2026 Budget: Thresholds, Zero-Rating, Second-Hand Goods, and Compliance
- South African Court Rules Only Parliament Can Change VAT Rate, Not Finance Minister
- 2026 South Africa VAT Threshold Changes: What SMEs Must Know About Compulsory and Voluntary Registration














