- The Supreme Court of Appeal ruled in favor of Woolworths Holdings Limited regarding input VAT claims.
- Woolworths was involved in a dispute over VAT on fees from a rights offer to fund the acquisition of David Jones.
- SARS argued the rights offer was an isolated transaction, not part of Woolworths’ regular enterprise activities.
- Woolworths claimed the fees as input tax, asserting the share issue was part of its enterprise as an investment holding company.
- The SCA rejected the narrow approach, confirming Woolworths’ activities as an active investment holding company.
- The judgment emphasized a comprehensive view of a vendor’s activities, not isolating single transactions.
- The court recognized capital-raising as integral to an investment holding company’s enterprise.
- Woolworths’ services from foreign underwriters were not considered imported services subject to additional VAT.
Source: pkf.co.za
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- South Africa’s 5-Corner Peppol Integration to Modernize E-Invoicing and VAT Reporting by 2028
- New VAT Apportionment Reporting Requirements to SARS: Compliance and True-Up Adjustments Explained
- High Court Upholds Tax Court Ruling: Payroll Service Provider Not Liable for SDL and VAT
- Eswatini’s E-Invoicing Initiative: Advancing Tax Compliance and Digital Transformation by January 2028
- South Africa to End VAT Exemption on Low-Value Imports, Impacting eCommerce and Education
