The Amsterdam District Court acquitted a suspect of participating in a criminal organization and VAT fraud related to VoIP call minutes. There was insufficient evidence to prove the suspect knew about the VAT carousel fraud, even though their company acted as a “superbuffer” and correctly declared VAT. The court found no proof of active fraud by the suspect’s company or their knowledge of fraudulent activities elsewhere, noting that invoices aren’t automatically false simply because traffic was genuinely routed.
Source: btwjurisprudentie.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Industry Pension Fund May Partially Deduct VAT on Execution Costs for Employee Services
- VAT exemption for debt counselling as of Jan 1. 2026
- Senate accepts bill to retain reduced VAT rate on culture, media and sports
- VAT on residential rent by foreign temporary workers not deductible
- Dutch Court Rules Outsourced Payment Processing Qualifies for VAT Exemption
