- The Court of ‘s-Hertogenbosch confirms that X is a resident of the Netherlands but reduces the additional income tax assessments. The inspector failed to prove that the VAT carousel fraud generated income for X. Although VAT fraud was evident, it was not demonstrated that the unpaid VAT constituted income for X. Additionally, the inspector could not prove that the income from facilitating luxury expenses for others was directly received by X.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Tax Law Clarifies Data Reporting Rules for Small Business Scheme
- Court Rules No Right to Deduct Input Tax for Shareholder Advice Costs
- Entrepreneur Bound by Settlement Agreement in Tax Reassessment Case on Luxury Watches Sales
- Tax Fraud Lessons: The Perils of Mixing Business and Personal Finances
- Financial Application Disruption at Customs Halts Payments, Urgent Payment Requests Possible
