- BV X offered preventive medical check-ups including blood, saliva, urine, and stool tests
- Results were analyzed by medical students from a subsidiary of BV X
- BV X claimed their services were exempt from VAT as health care services
- The tax inspector disagreed, citing lack of required training and quality standards
- The court agreed with the inspector, stating services were not under proper medical supervision
- The medical students had not completed their medical training
- The quality of services was not equivalent to those provided by a qualified medical professional
- The court ruled against BV X’s claim for VAT exemption
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.